Can You Upload Preprints At Job Applications

Preprints can be good for your research career

Highlights

A preprint is a inquiry manuscript that is made freely available online by its authors earlier the manuscript has been peer reviewed.
Unlike traditional journal articles, preprints tin can exist posted quickly and are gratuitous to mail and read.
Preprinting can have career benefits for researchers because periodical articles that start appear as preprints may be cited more oft than articles that are non distributed as preprints. Citation counts are a cistron in hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions.
Because preprints are not peer reviewed when they are posted, how preprints should be evaluated remains unclear.
At Enquiry Foursquare, we encourage authors to leave constructive comments on their colleagues' preprints to help accost this evaluation effect. Effective comments follow normal guidelines for good peer reviews.

Summary

In preprinting, researchers make their manuscripts freely available online before those manuscripts have been peer reviewed. Preprints are free to upload and read, and they tin can exist made available as soon every bit manuscripts are complete. Preprinting avoids the high costs and lengthy publication times associated with journals. However, the benefits of preprinting remain unclear to many researchers.

In this article, we show that preprinting can increase the impact and decrease the fourth dimension to publication of preprinted manuscripts that are eventually submitted to journals. Because affect (every bit measured by citation counts) is a cistron in hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions, preprinting may assist researchers to advance in their careers.

Moreover, submitting manuscripts to a preprint platform that provides digital object identifiers (DOIs) helps protect the ideas in those manuscripts from being stolen. Preprinting is condign increasingly accustomed among funding agencies and periodical publishers.

Even so, how the research presented in preprints should exist evaluated remains an open up question. Journal publication and commendation counts likely provide some basis for evaluating preprints, just these mechanisms only become meaningful some fourth dimension subsequently preprints are posted.

Some preprint platforms likewise permit for public comments or provide other mechanisms to enable the inquiry community to apace evaluate the content of individual preprints. At Inquiry Square, we encourage researchers to apply these mechanisms to help the authors of preprints improve their manuscripts and ensure the quality of the enquiry literature.

What are preprints?

Preprinting is a new chemical element of the enquiry landscape that turns normal research publishing on its head.

Presently, many manuscripts are submitted directly to journals and become available simply after peer reviewers. Editors conclude that the manuscripts are ready for publication.

In preprinting, manuscripts that have not been peer reviewed are made freely bachelor online. These preprints can and then exist submitted to a journal for formal peer review or evaluated by the research community in real time through the platforms that host the preprints. Thus, while traditional journals evaluate manuscripts before publishing them, research is evaluated after information technology is posted in preprinting.

Preprints are free

Preprints are free to both read and publish, unlike articles in traditional journals. Many journals are bachelor only through research libraries because subscriptions to those journals are too expensive for individuals to buy on their own. Thus, many inquiry articles are not available to the general public, even though much research is carried out using coin from public funding agencies.

Articles in open admission journals are complimentary to download. However, the commodity publishing charges for many open up access journals are high enough that some researchers, particularly those in developing countries, cannot pay them. Thus, preprints remove the costs of reading and publishing inquiry manufactures imposed by traditional journals.

Preprint servers are faster than publishing in a periodical

The rapid sharing enabled past preprinting also distinguishes preprints from traditional periodical publishing. Publishing in a journal is oft a boring procedure. In ane recent survey, the boilerplate time required to publish a journal article was over a year [one]. There are many reasons that journal articles may accept a long fourth dimension to be published. Fundamental among them are:

The continuing increase in the number of manufactures that are published each year [2]
The claiming in finding peer reviewers caused by this increment in published articles
The need to reformat and resubmit rejected manuscripts [1, 3]

With preprinting, this lengthy wait is bypassed.

Preprinting is becoming more than popular

Given that preprints provide a complimentary, rapid means of disseminating new research, it's non surprising that the number of preprints posted each year is increasing chop-chop. As of late 2018, over 2,000 preprints were existence posted each calendar month to major biology-oriented preprint platform.southward Over 24,000 preprints appeared on those platforms in 2018 [4]. These numbers represent a 20-fold increment over the corresponding values for a decade before [4]. While preprints represent a pocket-size fraction of full inquiry output, the rate of growth in preprint publishing is much more rapid than that of traditional journal manufactures [2, 4].

How can preprinting do good researchers?

The career benefits of preprinting for individual researchers may be substantial. At to the lowest degree two contempo studies accept shown that journal manufactures made available every bit preprints before being published in a journal are cited more frequently than those that are non [five, 6]. Given that citation counts touch on hiring, promotion and tenure decisions, preprinting should arguably be considered by all researchers, specially early-career researchers.

Preprints are quicker to become published

Moreover, preprinted manuscripts submitted to a periodical may be published faster than those that do not appear as preprints. At one megajournal, preprinted manuscripts are published an average of nineteen days sooner than manuscripts that accept not been preprinted [7].

Many researchers remain cautious of preprinting because they fearfulness that their work will be stolen ("scooped"). One key characteristic of preprint platforms helps mitigate this concern.

When a preprint is published, a digital object identifier (DOI) is issued. This DOI enables citation of the preprint and includes when it was fabricated available online. Thus, preprinting provides an immutable time stamp for inquiry contributions that tin be used to establish who had an idea start. In cases in which preprinted manuscripts are copied and published in journals, the DOIs tin exist provided to the journals' editors as prove of research misconduct. Reputable journals will so retract the plagiarized articles.

Journal publishers are lightening up to preprints

Moreover, journal publishers and funding agencies are condign increasingly accepting of preprints. I community-updated list shows 35 publishers whose editorial policies specifically permit the publication of preprints, including SpringerNature, Elsevier, IEEE, and Cambridge University Press [eight].

While some journals still do not publish manuscripts that have appeared online as preprints, these policies are likely to shift equally preprints become a routine function of inquiry publishing. Some funding agencies now allow the citation of preprints in grant applications (eastward.one thousand., the Wellcome Trust [nine], the United states National Institutes of Health [10], and the European Research Quango [11]).

How can preprints be assessed?

Assessment and quality control remain key issues in preprinting. Unlike periodical manufactures, which are peer reviewed before they are published, preprints are generally not examined by independent researchers before they are made available. Thus, it may not be clear which preprints in a given field represent well-washed research.

Two features of normal research practice may help provide this quality command:

First, many preprinted manuscripts are subsequently submitted to journals, where they are evaluated through the normal peer review process. Those manuscripts that are then published presumably correspond well-done enquiry.
Second, every bit noted to a higher place, preprints with DOIs can exist cited simply like peer-reviewed journal articles. The number of citations that a preprint receives should judge the value of the inquiry that preprint describes.

However, both traditional mechanisms for evaluating preprints are relatively slow.There is an active give-and-take as to how preprints can be evaluated in existent time. Some preprint platforms enable members of the inquiry community to annotate on preprints, although the value of such comments is debated [12]. It has too been suggested that a form of self-organizing peer review could be instituted directly on preprint platforms by providing appropriate incentives to participating researchers [13].

At Research Square, we encourage members of the research community to leave constructive comments on their colleagues' preprints. If constructive commenting becomes a widespread practice, information technology may help to improve the overall quality of preprints and the inquiry literature equally a whole. Constructive comments follow the same guidelines as good peer reviews; for suggestions, see [14, 15].

Conclusion

In conclusion, preprints provide important benefits relative to the traditional, journal-based model of inquiry publishing in that they permit rapid advice of new results and are gratis to upload and read. Preprinting can benefit individual researchers through increasing commendation counts and decreasing the time to publication for manuscripts that are somewhen published every bit journal articles.

Preprints are also becoming increasingly accepted past both funding agencies and journal publishers. How preprints should be evaluated remains an open question, simply both traditional and novel evaluation methods may help solve this problem.

At Research Square, we encourage researchers to comment on their colleagues' preprints because effective comments may help better both preprints and published manufactures.

Before submitting your research every bit a preprint, utilise our academic English Editing services for your manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Jodi Harrell & Kristen Kato who contributed to the terminal version of this article.

A note to readers: AJE is a segmentation of Research Square Company. Our colleagues built and operate the Research Square preprint platform. For more author resources on preprints we encourage you to browse the content on the Research Square Weblog.

References

Grigston, J.; Mudrak, B. 2016. The State of Authorship: Maximizing Affect with the Fourth dimension and Money Y'all Spend. White newspaper, AJE. https://world wide web.aje.com/arc/state-of-authorship-report/
Mudrak, B. 2016. AJE Scholarly Publishing Report 2016. AJE. https://world wide web.aje.com/arc/scholarly-publishing-trends-2016/
Wong, T. E.; Srikrishnan, V.; Hadka, D.; Keller, K. 2017. A multi-objective controlling approach to the journal submission problem. PLOS I. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178874, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/commodity?id=10.1371/periodical.pone.0178874
Anaya, J. 2018. Monthly Statistics for December 2018. PrePubMed. http://www.prepubmed.org/monthly_stats/
Feldman, S.; Lo, K.; Ammar, W. 2018. Citation Count Analysis for Papers with Preprints. arXiv:1805.05238. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.05238
Fraser, Due north.; Momeni, F.; Mayr, P.; Peters, I. 2018. The issue of bioRxiv preprints on citations and altmetrics. bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/673665, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/x.1101/673665v1
Public Library of Science. 2019. Trends in Preprints. The Official PLOS Blog. https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/10/trends-in-preprints/
Wikipedia. Accessed 24 January 2020. List of academic journals past preprint policy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_journals_by_preprint_policy
Wellcome Trust. 2017. We at present take preprints in grant applications. https://wellcome.ac.uk/news/nosotros-now-have-preprints-grant-applications
Kaiser, J. 2017. NIH enables investigators to include draft preprints in grant proposals. Science. doi:ten.1126/science.aal0961, https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/nih-enables-investigators-include-draft-preprints-grant-proposals
Matthews, D. 2018. New heave for preprints subsequently acceptance past ERC. Times Higher Instruction. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/new-boost-preprints-after-acceptance-erc
Polka, J. 2017. Preprint comments: boon or 'bog?' The American Society for Jail cell Biological science. https://www.ascb.org/scientific discipline-policy/preprint-comments-benefaction-bog/
LingFeng, Due west. 2019. Self-organising peer review for preprints – A future prototype for scholarly publishing. The London Schoolhouse of Economic science and Political Science Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/04/17/self-organising-peer-review-for-preprints-a-future-paradigm-for-scholarly-publishing/
Stiller-Reeve, Chiliad. 2018. How to write a thorough peer review. Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06991-0, https://world wide web.nature.com/manufactures/d41586-018-06991-0
Applegate, P. J. How to write a expert peer review. Recorded talk, American Journal Experts. Slides, https://www.aje.com/dist/docs/How-to-Write-a-Expert-Peer-Review-Research-Square-AJE.pdf; recording, https://www.aje.com/arc/webinar-quality-in-peer-review/

Date of Publication: 3-31-2020

Source: https://www.aje.com/arc/Preprints-can-be-good-for-your-research-career/

Posted by: bermudezintond1957.blogspot.com